Quantcast
Channel: Scholarly Open-Access Publishers – Scholarly Open Access
Viewing all 421 articles
Browse latest View live

Predatory Publisher Exploits Einstein, Debases Science

$
0
0
Relatively awful

Relatively awful

A new, India-based predatory publisher has emerged — Einstein International Journal Organization. The publisher gratuitously uses the name of one of one of history’s greatest scientists to attract manuscripts and author fees from unwary researchers for its nine anti-journals.

Two things stand out about this publisher’s journals: they combine multiple fields of study, including fields not normally treated together in the same journal, and they are in some cases devoted to pseudo-science.

My favorite is the EIJO Journal of Civil Engineering, Architecture, Interior Design and Innovative Research (EIJO–CEAIDIR). You don’t see too many scholarly journals that cover interior design, and there are even fewer that combine this field with civil engineering. Of course, the publisher claims — falsely — that the journal has an impact factor of 2.078. Pretty much all journals from India have impact factors now, most of them made up.

EIJO Journal of Homeopathic, Unani Medicine and Innovative Research

Colorful junk science.

Another of their journals is the EIJO Journal of Homeopathic, Unani Medicine and Innovative Research (EIJO-HUMIR). Unani is a pseudo-science associated with the silly “cupping” trend. This journal at least does not list any impact factor, and it hasn’t published any articles yet, thankfully. It’s just someone’s bad idea at this stage.

The publisher is based in Jaipur, Rajasthan. It requires its unlucky authors to both pay to publish ($100) and transfer their copyright. The author fees are to be deposited directly into Mrs. Nitu’s personal savings account:

Profit center.

Profit center.

I think that if Albert Einstein were alive today to read the journals published by the Einstein International Journal Organization he would be sickened, and no amount of lead-tainted treatment from pseudo-sciences such as Ayurveda or Unani would make him well again.

Additional reading:

Beninger, P. G., Beall, J. & Shumway, S. E. (2016). Debasing the currency of science: The growing menace of predatory open access journals. Journal of Shellfish Research, 35(1), 1-5.

Appendix: List of Einstein International Journal Organization journals as of 2016-08-10

  1. EIJO Journal of Ayurveda, Herbal Medicine and Innovative Research (EIJO–AHMIR)
  2. EIJO Journal of Bio-Technology, Food Technology, Agriculture and Innovative Research (EIJO–JBTFTAIR)
  3. EIJO Journal of Civil Engineering, Architecture, Interior Design and Innovative Research (EIJO–CEAIDIR)
  4. EIJO Journal of Engineering, Technology and Innovative Research (EIJO–JETIR)
  5. EIJO Journal of Homeopathic, Unani Medicine and Innovative Research (EIJO-HUMIR)
  6. EIJO Journal of Humanities, Social Affair, Management and Innovative Research (EIJO–JHSAMIR)
  7. EIJO Journal of Law, Cyber Crime, Justice and Innovative Research (EIJO-JLCCJIR)
  8. EIJO Journal of Medical, Health Science, and Innovative Research (EIJO–JMHSIR)
  9. EIJO Journal of Science, Technology and Innovative Research (EIJO–JSTIR)


August’s Harvest: Three Wretched Open-Access Publishers

$
0
0
The rubbish publishers keep on appearing.

The rubbish publishers keep on appearing.

This blog post profiles three new scholarly open-access publishers added to my list in August, 2016. The names cover the alphabet from A to Z: American Journal, Scholars Middle East Publishers, and Zygoscient. Additionally, I append a short description of a standalone predatory journal that took liberties with a United States Government logo.

As American as curried rice.

As American as curried rice.

1. American Journal. This publisher has a grammatical error in its name, for it publishes three open-access journals and should be called ‘American Journals.” It actually is based in the United States, unlike most OA publishers that exploit North American geography in their names.

It’s based in Connecticut, and it’s owned by a bunch of Bangladeshis or Bangladeshi-Americans that live in the New York City Area. I wrote about them three and a half years ago. Among all their open-access imprints, they publish thousands of journals.

Everything's a lie here.

Everything’s a lie here.

2. Scholars Middle East Publishers claims it’s based in Dubai. However, most of its journals steal the name of a neighboring kingdom and start with the phrase, “Saudi Journal of …

In all the firm publishes eleven journals, with twelve others listed as “upcoming.” Here are their instructions for submitting a paper: “Manuscript should submit along with electronically to the email IDs : scholarsmepub@gmail.com.”

Generous, they only charge $25 per paper, but given the abysmal quality of this publisher, even this rock-bottom APC may be too much. Suspiciously, they also accept payments in Indian rupees.

Perhaps this publisher should be re-named to “Scholars South Asia Publishers.”

Zygoscient

Zygo-trash.

3. Zygoscient is a brand-new publisher of six medical journals that smells like OMICS International. It says, “Contact info, Los Angeles, California,” which only tells us it’s headquarters is most certainly somewhere other than LA.

I got a copy of one of their spam emails, and it was signed by “Michael Skyler,” certainly a contrived name. The spam begins,

I hope you are doing well!

We are truly obliged to introduce our Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiac Therapy which has been recently launched and is looking forward to frame up an eminent and outstanding first issue with the best quality articles.

We have chosen selected scientists who have contributed excellent work to the scientific community, thus I kindly request you to contribute Research, Case report, Letter to editor, Short communication or Review manuscript for publication in our Inaugural issue.

See? Typical OMICS International prose. OMICS International is trying to saturate scholarly publishing and completely take it over. It is creating dozens of bogus publishers such as Zygoscient.

This publisher is the last one on my list, alphabetically.

Bonus:

Stealing from the U.S. Government.

Stealing from the U.S. Government.

The image above is a screenshot of part of the homepage of the International Journal of Engineering Science Invention Research & Development, based somewhere in India.

Does the circular logo look familiar? It’s derived, probably as a trademark violation, from the logo of the United States National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

The original logo.

The original logo.

Predatory publishers continue to increase in number. The problem is not going away anytime soon.

 

Appendix:

List of American Journal journals as of 2016-08-19:

  1. American Journal of Engineering & Natural Sciences (AJENS)
  2. American Journal of Business Studies (AJBS)
  3. American Journal of Social Studies (AJSS)

 

List of Scholars Middle East Publishers journals as of 2016-08-19:

  1. Saudi Journal of Biomedical Research (SJBR)
  2. Saudi Journal of Business and Management Studies
  3. Saudi Journal of Engineering and Technology
  4. Saudi Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
  5. Saudi Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences
  6. Saudi Journal of Pathology and Microbiology (SJPM)
  7. Scholars Bulletin
  8. Haya: The Saudi Journal of Life Sciences
  9. Saudi Journal of Oral and Dental Research (SJODR)
  10. Saudi Journal of Biomedical Research (SJBR)
  11. Saudi Journal of Medicine (SJM)

 

List of Zygoscient journals as of 2016-08-19:

  1. International Journal of STD and AIDS Research (IJSTADAIDSR)
  2. Journal of Anesthetic Research and Pain Medicine (JARPM)
  3. Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiac Therapy (JCCCT)
  4. Journal of Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Syndrome (JDMMS)
  5. Journal of Stem Cells and Regenerative Therapy (JSCRT)
  6. Obstetrics and Gynaecology Insights (OGI)

Article on Fallacious and Pseudoscientific Thought Worth a Read

$
0
0
Definitely worth a read.

Definitely worth a read.

I subscribe to several saved-search, citation, and table-of-contents alerts, and through these, I learn of 10-20 newly-published scholarly articles each week that match my research interests. Of these, I generally select four or five to print out and read. Every few months or so, one of the articles I read stands out as exemplary and memorable. Here is one such article.

The article is entitled, “Evaluating Claims to Avoid Pseudoscientific and Unproven Practices in Special Education.” The sole author is Dr. Jason C. Travers of the University of Kansas. The article stands out for its description of the problem of pseudoscience in the context of contemporary scholarly publishing, for its clear prose, and for the applicability of the article’s findings beyond the author’s own field of special education.

The fact that the article cites me is pretty nice also.

Predatory publishers have drawn renewed attention to published pseudoscience. Those wanting to publish junk science have found predatory open-access journals happy to take their money and publish their rubbish science as if it were authentic.

A table from the article that compares science and pseudoscience.

A table from the article that compares science and pseudoscience.

Here’s a short selection from the article:

A main feature of pseudoscience is its emphasis on seeking support for an already-held belief, usually through low-grade forms of evidence (e.g., testimonials, anecdotes, coincidences). In other words, pseudoscience tends to focus on confirming what is already believed. Conversely, science requires suspension of belief in a claim until sufficient evidence is available.

Pseudoscience typically is associated with grandiose claims that are not supported by evidence or, in some cases, in direct opposition with evidence. Science is conservative and therefore more likely to result in gradual changes that are informed by the collection of facts. Whereas science values open-mindedness and results in changes in belief based on new evidence, pseudoscience typically is dogmatic in the face of new evidence. Promoters of pseudoscientific interventions typically use convoluted language and borrow jargon to appear more credible (e.g., “brain-based learning”), but scientists use precise terminology with explicit procedures conducive to verification by independent researchers. And while scientists seek out and value criticism from their peers, pseudoscientists view critics as adversaries and often work alone.

Reading the article reminded me of the following:

  • Scientific conclusions may be unpopular, yet science values integrity and truth, even when prevailing opinion disagrees. Science should not be democratized.
  • Attention metrics in scholarly publishing are undermining science. Anyone with internet access can increase the altmetrics of a pseudoscience article, increasing its popularity, a new proxy for impact.
  • Science’s gatekeeping and quality control function, peer review, is more essential than ever. It’s imperfect, but there are no viable alternatives.

Travers’ article provides a useful overview of fallacious and pseudoscientific thought in science and how to recognize and avoid it.

Appendix: The article’s current citation:

Travers, Jason C. (2016). Evaluating claims to avoid pseudoscientific and unproven practices in special education. Intervention in School and Clinic. [In press]. http://doi.org/10.1177/1053451216659466


USF Associate Dean is Tied to Dozens of Predatory Journals

$
0
0
Can't say no.

Can’t say no.

An associate dean from the University of South Florida (USF) is the editor-in-chief of six questionable, open-access journals and serves on the editorial boards of dozens more. He lists them in his CV.

Dr. Mark S. Kindy is — ironically — the Associate Dean for Research and Innovation as the University of South Florida’s College of Pharmacy. He’s also associated with the VA Hospital in Tampa, according to his lengthy, 41-page CV.

His CV indicates he is the Editor-in-Chief of the following open-access journals (publisher name in parentheses):

What serious researcher would want to edit a journal from a publisher named “Mr. Scholar“? Some of the above journals have more than one EiC. Also, for Scholar’s Advances in Animal & Veterinary Research, the journal lists him as one of three “Section Editors” rather than Editor-in-Chief, as his vita claims.

The publisher of each of the above journals is on my list. Both OMICS International and Austin Publishing Group are super predatory and have victimized many honest researchers. The United States Federal Trade Commission recently launched a lawsuit against OMICS International, an action I welcome.

By my count, Kindy’s vita claims he has served on the editorial board of 121 different scholarly journals, including both current and former service. I haven’t checked every one, but most of them appear to me to be journals belonging to publishers on my list. One of the journals he lists is an oceanography journal, far from his own field of pharmacy.

I learned about Kindy because a new predatory publisher is spamming for article submissions using his name. The publisher is called Research Open, which launched recently with four broad-scoped, open-access journals.

Rubbish Open

Rubbish Open

Kindy is listed as one of two co-Editors-in-Chief of Research Open’s Internal Medicine Research—Open Journal, though this service does not appear on his vita yet. I think Research Open may be an effort of OMICS International. The publisher is establishing dozens of smaller open-access publishers, saturating the scholarly publishing industry with junk journals, such as the ones Kindy oversees.

Analysis

Some researchers choose to beef up their CVs by publishing in easy-acceptance, pay-to-publish journals and by joining the editorial boards of such journals. Such publishing and memberships are certainly within the bounds of academic freedom, but hiring processes at serious research universities ought to eliminate from consideration job candidates who exploit easy publishing and automatic acceptance on journal editorial boards.

I don’t understand why the University of South Florida has hired an Associate Dean for Research and Innovation whose record indicates association with journals from so many disreputable publishers. Typically, predatory publishers don’t carry out an authentic peer review, and they accept papers regardless of quality just to earn fees from the authors. This practice is contrary to the missions of research universities, institutions that typically value scientific integrity and selectivity.

Some — perhaps most — of Kindy’s published research appears in reputable journals, so I don’t fully understand why he would serve on editorial boards of so many predatory journals yet publish in reputable ones. Perhaps it’s because being a member of a predatory editorial board requires little or no work, as few perform any peer review. So he can fill up this section of his CV without having to do any work. Clever.

Hat tip: Dr. Alexandra F. Dalton

Appendix 1:

List of journals on Mark S. Kindy’s CV for which he claims editorial board membership:

  • Neuroscience Research Communications
  • American Journal of Pathology
  • Amyloid
  • Stroke
  • Neural Regeneration Research
  • Future Neurology
  • American Journal of Translational Research
  • Open Journal of Neuroscience
  • International Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
  • Current Aging Science,
  • World Journal of Translational Medicine
  • World Journal of AIDS
  • Open Journal of Immunology
  • World Journal of Vaccine
  • Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease & Parkinsonism
  • Atherosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology
  • Guest Editor, World Journal of Neuroscience
  • NeuroMolecular Medicine
  • Journal of Neuroinflammation
  • World Journal of Biological Chemistry
  • World Journal of Methodology
  • Guest Editor, International Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease,
  • Special Issue on Alzheimer’s Disease: Environmental and
  • Epigenetic Factors
  • Journal of Genetic Disorders & Disease Information
  • Oceanography: Open Access
  • World Journal of Methodology Editorial Board
  • Journal of Neurology and Translational Neurosciences
  • Austin Journal of Drug Abuse and Addiction
  • International Journal of Forensic Science & Pathology
  • Journal of Cardiology & Clinical Research
  • Austin Journal of Clinical Cardiology
  • Austin Journal of Genetics and Genomic Research
  • Austin Vaccines
  • Austin Journal of HIV/AIDS Research
  • Journal of AIDS Clinical Research and STDs
  • Journal of Neurocardiovascular Disease
  • Translational Stroke Research
  • Journal of Gene Therapy and Genetic Disorders
  • Clinical Interventions in Aging
  • Journal of Inflammation Research
  • Austin Journal of Cerebrovascular Disease and Stroke
  • Journal of Addiction and Neuropharmacology
  • Austin Journal of Cardiovascular Disease and Atherosclerosis
  • SIDS Clinical Research and STDs
  • Medical Genomics and Biomarkers
  • Journal of Experimental Cardiology and Research
  • Austin Journal of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s Disease
  • Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences
  • International Journal of Vaccines and Research
  • Annals of Neuroscience and Psychology
  • Journal of Parkinson’s Disease and Alzheimer’s Disease
  • Journal of AIDS Clinical Research and STDs
  • Journal of Cardiovascular Disease
  • International Journal of Neural Science and Brain Research
  • Journal of Immunology and Immunotherapeutics
  • International Journal of HIV/AIDS and Research (IJHR)
  • Scholarena Journal of Cardiology
  • Scholarena Journal of Neurology
  • Journal of AIDS and Immune Research
  • Journal of AIDS and HIV
  • Neurology: Open Access
  • International Journal of Vaccines and Immunization
  • International Journal of Stem Cell Research and Transplantation
  • Journal of Medical Education and Informatics
  • International Journal of Neurology and Brain Disorders
  • Pharmacologia
  • Drug Design, Development and Therapy
  • Journal of Genetic Disorders and Genetic Reports
  • Advances in Genetic Engineering
  • SM Vaccines and Vaccination Journal (SMVVJ)
  • Roger Journal of Cardiology
  • Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
  • Journal of HIV/AIDS
  • Journal of Neuroscience and Neuroeconomics
  • Jacobs Journal of Anatomy
  • Journal of Aging and Disease
  • Journal of Vaccine Research
  • Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews
  • Journal of Cancer Biomarkers
  • Journal of Immunological Diseases and Disorders
  • Journal of Biomedical Sciences
  • Stem Cells and Regenerative Biology
  • Journal of Global Vaccines and Immunology
  • International Journal of Neurological Disorders & Interventions
  • Annals of Alzheimer’s and Dementia Care
  • Kenkyu Journal of Pharmacology
  • Journal of Clinical Case Studies
  • Nutrition and Food Sciences
  • Journal of Clinical Interventions in Aging
  • Trends in HIV/AIDS
  • SRL Alzheimer’s & Parkinson’s Disease
  • SRL Cardiovascular Diseases & Diagnosis
  • Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuroimmunology
  • Journal of Immunology and Immunotherapy
  • Brain Circulation
  • Insights in Blood Pressure
  • Translational Brain Rhythmicity
  • Madridge Journal of Pharmaceutical Research
  • Clinical Trails and Case Studies Journal
  • JBR Journal of Translational Biomarkers & Diagnosis
  • Journal of Clinical Case studies
  • European Medical Journal
  • JSM Clinical and Medical Imaging
  • Biomedical Research
  • Reactive Oxygen Species
  • SciTz Gynecology & Reproductive Medicine
  • Annals of Alzheimer’s and Dementia Care
  • SciFed Drug Delivery & Research Journal
  • Journal Clinics in Oncology – Radiation Oncology
  • Annals of Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Journal of Zoological Sciences
  • Clinics in Oncology
  • Translational Biomedicine
  • Journal of Imaging Sciences
  • HeighPubs Journal of Pathology and Clinical Research
  • HeighPubs Clinical Microbiology and Biochemical Technology
  • Journal of Oncology and Therapeutics
  • Journal of Clinical Nephrology
  • Journal of Genetic Medicine and Gene Therapy
  • Journal of Stroke Research

Appendix 2:

Text of an email sent under the name of Mark S. Kindy for a journal from the new predatory publisher Research Open:

From: Mark S Kindy – Editor In Chief <editor.imroj@rowjournals.com>
Date: August 12, 2016 at 7:06:15 AM MDT
To: < Redacted >
Subject: Follow up email :  Call for Internal Medicine manuscript submissions

Dear Dr. [Redacted],

Thank you again for your time today.

I would like to follow up on my previous E-mail regarding your contribution to Inaugural issue of “Internal Medicine Research Open Journal (IMROJ)”. As a founding member of the journal I would like to invite you for submitting your upcoming Research/Review/Case Reports to Inaugural issue of IMROJ and I am excited to work with you and anticipate the development of the Journal with quality submissions like yours.

For manuscript submission guidelines please visit the link below
http://www.researchopenworld.com/authors-desk

You are welcome to submit the manuscript as an attachment to email at submissions@researchopenworld.com or as a reply to this email.

I hope the Inaugural articles will enhance the quality of the journal and please let me know if you have any questions or need anything else on my end. Kindly inform us your feasibility of submission at the earliest.

Regards
Inviting on behalf of Founding Editor-In-Chief Prof. Mark S Kindy
Yun Wang
Assistant editorial Manager
Internal Medicine Research-Open Journal


More Competition for Crossref?

$
0
0
Oh boy, another one.

Oh boy, another one.

Another persistent identifier company has emerged: Unique Object Identifier.

I learned recently about the launch of a new persistent identifier targeting the scholarly publishing domain: Unique Object Identifier. In January of this year, I wrote about an earlier effort, the Scientific Object Identifier. Pretty soon, our objects will be drowning in identifiers.

The Unique Object Identifier system, which appears to be an implementation of the handle system, was started by a firm called Savari Technologies Pvt. Ltd. It is based in Pune, India and appears to be chiefly an Internet Service Provider.

The predominant identifier system in scholarly publishing is made available by Cossref, a non-profit organization with wide membership of companies in the scholarly publishing industry — perhaps too wide. Crossref markets the ubiquitous DOI, the digital object identifier.

Another circular logo.

Another circular logo.

As somebody once said, “The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them.”

Let’s hope the number of “unique” identifiers doesn’t surpass the number of predatory publishers


Open-Access Journal Charges People to Serve on Its Editorial Board

$
0
0
Journal of Scientific Letters

Return to sender.

The Journal of Scientific Letters is another low-quality, India-based open-access journal that is idiosyncratic, non-standard, and appallingly unprofessional. The journal’s website states that it charges researchers to serve on its editorial board.

This standalone journal has a colorful website, incorporating pirated pictures from across the Internet. The journal is a one-man operation run out of an apartment in Calcutta. Its sole proprietor is Swati Paul.

Paul’s English is poor, which is reflected in the website:

JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC LETTERS (JSL) is a peer reviewed multi-disciplinary an online & open access Triannual English version international journal which specialize in the publication of articles related to the following fields:

Remarkably, Paul has the audacity to charge researchers to serve on this predatory journal’s editorial board.

Pay to review.

Pay to review.

The text says,

Interested to Join our Editorial Board Member
If any individual is interested to join our editorial board then s/he must be submitted CV with photo to our email: editor.jslsci2016@gmail.com/ which should be addressed to the Editor in Chief. After receiving acceptance through email, the fees should be submitted & after that the name will be appear this page under Members of the Central Executive Committee column. After acceptance, the bank details will be send to the applicant email. Please noted that, fees are not refundable in any circumstances.

Fees:
a) Yearly: INR 3000/- (For India) or USD 40 (For other countries)
b) Lifetime: INR 21000/- (For India) or USD 300 (For other countries)

Therefore, the editorial board — which currently has 29 members — is really a list of people who have been duped by this journal. How embarrassing!

This is scholarly publishing?

This is scholarly publishing?

This completely bogus journal is further evidence of the Indian scholarly publishing industry’s decline and fall. The journal charges authors $30 to $50 to publish, requires copyright transfer, and promises to complete “peer review” in 5-7 days.

When will this nonsense ever end?

Hat tip: Nicolle Watts, pubshub

 


Two More Scholarly “Super Achievers”

$
0
0
Shahaboddin Shamshirband (left) and Dalibor Petković.: clever guys with a plan.

Shahaboddin Shamshirband (left) and Dalibor Petković: clever guys with a plan.

Here are two researchers — one from Iran and currently working in Malaysia, and one based at Serbia’s University of Niš — who are either amazingly productive researchers, or some other scenario. Neither researcher appears to be exploiting the easy-acceptance offered by predatory journals. Is the whole scholarly publishing system falling apart?

Shahaboddin Shamshirband

Dr. Shamshirband is a senior lecturer at the Department of Computer Systems and Technology, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. He apparently got his Ph.D. there in 2014. In 2008, he earned a masters degree at Iran’s Islamic Azad University.

His CV shows he has authored or co-authored 212 scholarly articles since 2011. I count 49 articles under his name in 2016, an average of about six each month so far for the year. Stand by for more. Before 2014, he had only four publications, so the bulk of his research (over 200 articles) has been published in the period 2014 to now. He reports his h-index as 14, an amazing value for a researcher who’s been publishing just a few years.

 

Dalibor Petković

Petković is a member of the mechanical engineering faculty at Serbia’s University of Niš. His scholarly publishing statistics are also questionably high. For example, his Google Scholar profile indicates he has an h-index of 18 and a total of 1364 citations since 2011. His LinkedIn page says he got his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from the University of Nis in 2012. I see at least 19 articles he’s published in 2016 so far, over two per month. In the four-year period from August, 2012 to the present, his published journal articles number 105 by my count, or 26 articles per year, one every two weeks.

 

Questionable articles

It appears that these authors work together to produce salami-sliced articles and then simultaneously submit the various versions to several journals. Much of the text matches from article to article, but with simultaneous submission, plagiarism-checking software can’t always catch the duplication. Or are the publishers even checking?

Following are three references, each followed by a screenshot of the first part of the corresponding article’s introduction. Note the recycled text. The remaining text in the articles — as well as some of the figures — matches similarly.

Dalibor Petković, Shahaboddin Shamshirband, Nor Badrul Anuar, Mohd Hairul Nizam Md Nasir, Nenad T. Pavlović & Shatirah Akib. (2014). Adaptive neuro-fuzzy prediction of modulation transfer function of optical lens system. Infrared Physics & Technology 65, p. 54–60. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2014.03.011

ddddd

The first introduction, in an Elsevier journal.

Dalibor Petković, Shahaboddin Shamshirband, Hadi Saboohi, Tan Fong Ang, Nor Badrul Anuar, Zulkanain Abdul Rahman, Nenad T. Pavlović. (2014). Evaluation of modulation transfer function of optical lens system by support vector regression methodologies: A comparative study. Infrared Physics & Technology 65, p. 94–102. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2014.04.005

dddd

The second introduction, also in an Elsevier journal.

Dalibor Petković, Shahaboddin Shamshirband, Nenad T. Pavlović, Nor Badrul Anuar, Laiha Mat Kiah. (2014). Modulation transfer function estimation of optical lens system by adaptive neuro-fuzzy methodology. Optics and Spectroscopy 117(1), p. 121-131. http://doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X14070042

ddd

The third introduction, in a Springer journal.

Analysis

It seems these researchers have developed a successful salami slicing system for getting lots of articles published quickly in supposedly good journals. The high number of authors on each paper arouses suspicion also: are these authorship spots being brokered? Is this entire operation part of a sophisticated, international citation cartel?

Universities tend to have a “hands off” policy towards their highly-productive faculty, even when the accelerated production is under a cloud of suspicion. Faculty publications in top-tier journals help lift university and program rankings, and few universities are willing to stop a practice that elevates their rankings.

Scholarly publishing is supposed to work on a “gentleman’s agreement” basis, but the influence of predatory publishers has poisoned much of research communication, and the articles listed here are evidence of that.

I ask that the publishers involved in these cases investigate whether these publications violate ethical standards and policies.

Hat tip: Anonymous

Appendix:

Additional examples of apparent salami slicing:

First set, Articles on wind turbines:

Support vector regression methodology for wind turbine reaction torque prediction with power-split hydrostatic continuous variable transmission Journal Name: Energy, Volume 67, 1 April 2014, Pages 623–630. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544214001339

Wind turbine power coefficient estimation by soft computing methodologies: Comparative study, Energy Conversion and Management, Volume 81, May 2014, Pages 520–526. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890414001745

Survey of the most influential parameters on the wind farm net present value (NPV) by adaptive neuro-fuzzy approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Volume 57, May 2016, Pages 1270–1278. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032115015580

 

Second set, Articles on robotic grippers:

Dalibor Petković, Amir Seyed Danesh, Mehdi Dadkhah, Negin Misaghian, Shahaboddin Shamshirband, Erfan Zalnezhad, Nenad D. Pavlović, Adaptive control algorithm of flexible robotic gripper by extreme learning machine, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 37 (2016) 170–178, Received 14 September 2014 Received in revised form 28 July 2015 Accepted 7 September 2015 Available online 29 September 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2015.09.006

Dalibor Petković, Shahaboddin Shamshirband, Almas Abbasi, Kourosh Kiani, Eiman Tamah Al-Shammari, Prediction of contact forces of underactuated finger by adaptive neuro fuzzy approach, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 64-65 (2015) 520–527, Article history: Received 25 September 2013 Received in revised form 10 March 2015 Accepted 13 March 2015 Available online 23 April 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.03.013

Petkovi , D., Shamshirband, S., Anuar, N. B., Sabri, A. Q. M., Rahman, Z. B. A., &  , N. D. (2015). Input Displacement Neuro-fuzzy Control and Object Recognition by Compliant Multi-fingered Passively Adaptive Robotic Gripper. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 1-11. Received: 4 March 2013 / Accepted: 9 January 2015 / Published online: 29 January 2015. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-015-0182-6

Dalibor Petković · Shahaboddin Shamshirband · Hadi Saboohi · Tan Fong Ang · Nor Badrul Anuar · Nenad D. Pavlović, Support vector regression methodology for prediction of input displacement of adaptive compliant robotic gripper, Appl Intell (2014) 41:887–896 DOI 10.1007/s10489-014-0574-5 Published online: 19 August 2014.  http://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-014-0574-5

Dalibor Petković, Shahaboddin Shamshirband, Javed Iqbal, Nor Badrul Anuar, Nenad D. Pavlović, Miss Laiha Mat Kiah, Adaptive neuro-fuzzy prediction of grasping object weight for passively compliant gripper, Applied Soft Computing 22 (2014) 424–431, Article history: Received 9 December 2012 Received in revised form 20 February 2014 Accepted 26 April 2014 Available online 5 May 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.04.037

Dalibor Petković,  Javed Iqbal, Shahaboddin Shamshirband, Abdullah Gani,  Nenad D. Pavlovit, and Miss Laiha Mat Kiah. Kinetostatic Analysis of Passively Adaptive Robotic Finger with Distributed Compliance, Advances in Mechanical Engineering Received 25 September 2013; Accepted 7 December 2013; Published 2 January 2014. http://doi.org/10.1155/2014/145648

Petković, D; Pavlović, ND ; Shamshirband, S; Anuar, NB, Development of a new type of passively adaptive compliant gripper INDUSTRIAL ROBOT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, Volume: 40 Issue: 6 Pages: 610-623, 2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IR-12-2012-452

Salami slicing.

Salami slicing, any way you spell it.

 


Bogus Conferences Warning: Avoid All SGEM Conferences

$
0
0
The plague arrives in Vienna.

The plague arrives in Vienna.

Here’s a conference organizer I think everyone should avoid: SGEM. They don’t explain what their acronym means, and they are not transparent about other things as well. SGEM copies logos from legitimate organizations to make their conferences look legitimate and to lure people into registering for them.

The conference organizers appear to be based in Bulgaria and associated with someone named Dr. George Siarov. According to his profile on the company’s website, he is a “Scientist with two PhD researches [sic] in mining and geoinformatics.”

Certified bogus.

Certified bogus.

Most of the information on the colorful conference websites panders to potential registrants, displaying — for example — a bogus badge that says, “Academic Conference Excellence Certified Event.” No information is given regarding what organization certified the event, but most probably, no such certification ever occurred: the badge is a complete lie.

False and incompetent.

False and incompetent.

This for-profit conference organizer is not shy about lifting and using the logos from respected companies in the scholarly publishing industry, as shown in the image above. Rather stupidly, their website states, “This will rise up [sic] your impact factor.” Impact factors are earned by journals, not researchers.

It appears the firm’s next conference will be held in Vienna, Austria in November. When I visit the conference website, music plays on my computer. The registration fee for “delegates” is €360, plus, being Europe, 20% tax.

There is a plague of bogus conferences in East Asia right now. Sadly, they appear to be increasing in Europe as well, with SGEM as evidence of this. I recommend that researchers avoid for-profit conference organizers such as SGEM and seek out conferences from respected scholarly societies.

Appendix: All the 2016 SGEM conferences that I could find:

 



OA Megajournals Running Out of Unique Titles, Now Using Dumb Ones

$
0
0
Just precious.

Just precious.

There are so many megajournals being published now that they are running out of unique titles. I mean, there is a finite number of ways that you can re-arrange terms such as Science, Engineering, Research, Advanced, and Contemporary to create new and unique journal titles. Now predatory publishers are using really dumb words just to create unique titles.

One example is the International Journal of Precious Engineering Research and Applications (IJPERA), based in India’s Punjab state.

The term “precious engineering research” is really inappropriate for a serious scholarly journal.

Fast and precious.

Fast and precious.

The journal’s website is amateurish. It appears to operate out of a dwelling, for its “Contact Us” page gives this address:

Publisher Address
Jaspreet Kaur
Street No. 10, Parasram Nagar
Punjab, india [sic], Pin: 151001

The image above indicates that the publishing process is fast, with publishing taking place five days after registration, whatever that is. They are probably using the wrong word here again. They are probably trying to say that the articles will be published five days after they are accepted by the journal. In fact, on another page, the journal clarifies the speed of its publishing process:

Open-access journal

Open-access journal

To publish an article in the journal, they charge only $60, but you have to transfer your copyright to them.

By searching the publisher’s street address, I found another open-access journal that appears to be from the same guy person: International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Applications (IJPRA).

Proliferating.

Proliferating.

Its tagline is “Pointing your research to right [sic] direction.” It doesn’t have an ISSN yet.

I suspect the word “precious” has been mistranslated from the Punjabi language. We can probably expect additional journals from this publisher. When the easy money starts rolling in, it is hard to stop.


Does This Michigan Tech Prof Use Wikipedia to Attack Others and Self-Promote?

$
0
0
Wikipedia as a weapon

Wikipedia as a weapon, and a tool.

Here’s the story of a professor at Michigan Technological University who appears to be very active on Wikipedia. He apparently tried to get the article about me deleted, and there is some evidence that he (or somebody) uses Wikipedia to promote his published articles.  He is the subject of a Wikipedia investigation.

This busy guy is Joshua Pearce, an associate professor of Materials Science and Engineering and of Electrical and Computer Engineering. He appears to be another open-access / open-source zealot and apparently knows how to use Wikipedia to his advantage.

So, someone — apparently him — nominated the article about me for deletion. Nothing wrong with that — anyone in the world can make such a nomination, and Wikipedia has an open process for dealing with such nominations. In this case, the nomination was dealt with quickly — in a matter of hours in fact — with the encyclopedia concluding: “The result was speedy keep. No argument presented for deletion.”

The nomination was started by a guy using the handle “Gihiw” on Wikipedia. On the nomination page, there is a statement about this Wikipedia editor. It says:

Gihiw (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

This account has now been blocked by Wikipedia. Now there’s another page on Wikipedia called “Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard.” On that page, there is a section about Joshua Pearce. It says:

J. M. Pearce [edit]

While cleaning up citations to predatory journals I found a number of citations to Joshua Pearce (Pearce, JM). Other references in the same articles were also tot he same author, in different journals. I went through some histories and found that in each case the reference was added by a single-purpose account. I suspect there are a lot of them, here’s a brief sample:

I understand that Pearce is an authority, but this is stretching credulity: every single article I find with citations to his work, the citations were added by accounts that appear only to edit articles where he is cited, and which usually add those citations themselves.

This will take a while to check through and clean up. Guy (Help!) 17:01, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note that one of the Wikipedia editor names attributed here to Pearce is Gihiw, the account that nominated my article for deletion. So, is Dr. Pearce the person who nominated my article for deletion?

There is another page on Wikipedia with a section on “Citation spamming” that mentions Pearce. It says, ” Multiple additions of citations to the same author from predatory and other journals, by multiple editors with no history other than adding that material (i.e. probable citation spamming)”

The evidence.

The evidence.

Here we see that someone on Wikipedia suspects that a single Wikipedia editor is using seven accounts to add citations to Pearce’s published work. Is it Pearce himself?

Also, why would Pearce want to nominate my article for deletion? Perhaps his motivation lies in the fact that he has published in journals I have listed as predatory — here’s an example:

Pay to publish

Pay to publish

Pearce has published in the journal Modern Economy, from the China-based publisher Scientific Research Publishing (SCIRP). This publisher is on my list, and I’ve blogged about the pseudo-science it has proudly published, without retraction, including an article that describes sentient civilizations living on the planet Mars.

This publisher is perfect for Pearce, and SCIRP published his sole-authored article (written under his real name) “Quantifying the Value of Open Source Hard-ware [sic] Development” last year. Note that SCIRP’s copyediting is so poor that they use an obsolete spelling of the word hardware.

Conclusion

So, the evidence points to the conclusion that a professor at Michigan Tech who, seemingly unhappy with my listing as predatory the bogus publisher he uses to publish his articles in, nominates the Wikipedia article about me for deletion.

At least one person on Wikipedia is investigating several apparent sock puppet accounts that engage in “citation spamming” to the benefit of Pearce, adding citations to his work (from both legitimate and predatory journals) to Wikipedia articles.


Amateurish New OA Publisher Claims Association with Elsevier

$
0
0
Not likely.

Not likely.

There’s a new open-access publisher that claims it is cooperating with Elsevier, but I think the claim is highly unlikely. The publisher — Qingres — claims it’s based in the UK, another claim I find doubtful.

The publisher’s main page has a rotating banner at the top with two slides. One (shown above) proclaims its purported association with Elsevier, and the other invites researchers to submit manuscripts to “Create a SCI journal with high impact factors.”

The publisher launched with seven medical journals, all broad in scope and all in disciplines already saturated with journals — there’s no need for these new ones.

The website is adorned with logos from legitimate companies and organizations, and there’s a long list of “Cooperative Institutions.”

Keep dreaming.

Keep dreaming.

The publisher has Photoshopped its name on a picture of a building somewhere, the second time I’ve seen this deception.

Qingres makes several mentions of SCI and impact factors on the website. At the bottom of some pages this statement appears:

We only wish the impact factor of this Journal to go up with time elapse!

In fact, the publisher has waived fees until the journals get indexed in SCI, something I estimate will take a very long time, if it ever occurs. In the “authors’ guide” for one of the journals, the publisher says,

The publication for JPBS is now free of charge. After it has been included in SCI, the publication fee would be charged.

They also reveal their lack of publishing experience by giving contradictory licensing policies. In one place they say, “Editors/authors who contribute in the JPBS will transfer copyright of their work to the JPBS publisher.” But in another place they say, “The majority of authors retain copyright for their articles and our standard license allows liberal reuse rights.”

The publisher’s internet domain name data is blinded, except for this:

Registrant Name: huifang jiao

Qingres — the name is not explained — is an optimistic yet poorly-conceived open-access startup. I recommend that researchers not submit manuscripts to its journals and decline invitations to serve on its editorial boards.

Hat tip: Dr. Judit Ward, et al.

Appendix: List of Qingres journals as of 2016-09-24:

  1. Journal of Biomedical Frontiers
  2. Journal of International Medical Analysis
  3. Journal of Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine
  4. Journal of Precision Medicine
  5. Journal of Psychiatry and Brain Science
  6. Med One
  7. Pharmaceutical Frontiers

Scam Publisher OMICS International Buying Legitimate Journals

$
0
0
To the Dark Side.

To the Dark Side.

Hyderabad, India-based open-access publisher OMICS International is on a buying spree, snatching up legitimate scholarly journals and publishers, incorporating them into its mega-fleet of bogus, exploitative, and low-quality publications.

Sources indicate that OMICS has purchased the publisher Pulsus Group. In February, 2016, I reported on some strange activity surrounding the Canadian publisher Andrew John Publishing. Now is becoming clear that OMICS purchased Andrew John and is using it as a Canadian ‘base’ of sorts to purchase other Canadian journals, especially society journals.

The Pulsus Group website bears a London, UK address. Pulsus has published about two-dozen Canadian medical society journals, including these titles:

  • Canadian Hearing Report
  • Canadian Journal of Pathology
  • Canadian Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • Canadian Journal of Educators of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing
  • Canadian Journal of Restorative Dentistry and Prosthodontics
One of the journals published by Pulsus Group,, under contract.

One of the journals published by Pulsus Group,, under contract.

The medical societies had contracted with Pulsus to manage the publishing of their journals for them, a common practice. Now there is panic among the staff and editors of many Canadian medical journals as they learn that OMICS International has purchased Pulsus.

OMICS International is not a bona fide scholarly publisher. It does not operate in good faith and victimizes honest researchers.

OMICS International is a major source of annoying spam and a threat to science. It is a predatory publisher and is included on my list. I have also added Pulsus to my list.

A new OMICS imprint, Open Access Journals.

A new OMICS imprint, Open Access Journals.

In addition, OMICS has set up a new publisher — called Open Access Journals — and is transferring some of its recently-acquired journals there.

OMICS’ new imprint Open Access Journals claims on its “contact us” page that it belongs to Pulsus and also shows a base in London, UK.

One of the journals in the fleet of OMICS’ Open Access Journals imprint is Neuropsychiatry. The journal has a legitimate impact factor and is included in the top academic indexes. The former publisher of this journal is Future Medicine. In fact, most of the Open Access Journals journals appear to have been purchased from Future Medicine.

A note on Future Medicine’s website says:

Sold to OMICS International.

Sold to OMICS International.

OMICS International is on a mission to take over all of scholarly publishing. It is purchasing journals and publishers and incorporating them into its evil empire. Its strategy is to saturate scholarly publishing with its low-quality and poorly-managed journals, aiming to squeeze out and acquire legitimate publishers.

 

Appendix

A. List of Pulsus journals as of 2016-09-23 (copied from the website)

  1. Allied Hearing Health
  2. Canadian Hearing Report
  3. Canadian Hearing Report enews
  4. Canadian IONM News
  5. Canadian Journal of Educators of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing
  6. Canadian Journal of General Internal Medicine
  7. Canadian Journal of Medical of Sonography
  8. Canadian Journal of Pathology
  9. Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy
  10. Canadian Journal of Restorative Dentistry and Prosthodontics
  11. CASLPO Today
  12. Clinical Investigation
  13. Clinical Practice (Therapy)
  14. Current Research: Cardiology
  15. Current Research: Integrative Medicine
  16. Diabetes Management
  17. Imaging in Medicine
  18. International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology
  19. International Journal of Clinical Skills
  20. Interventional Cardiology
  21. Journal of Men’s Health
  22. Journal of Sexual & Reproductive Medicine
  23. Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada
  24. Listen/Écoute
  25. Neuropsy
  26. Pharmaceutical Bioprocessing
  27. Plastic Surgery
  28. Plastic Surgery: Case Studies
  29. Signal
  30. Sound Matters
  31. Vascular Access
  32. Vibes
  33. Wavelength

List of Pulsus journals as of 2016-09-28 (copied from the website)

  1. Plastic Surgery (Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons, Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Groupe pour l’Avancementde la Microchirurgie Canada, Canadian Society for Surgery of the Hand)
  2. Plastic Surgery: Case Studies (Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons, Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Groupe pour l’Avancement de la Microchirurgie Canada, Canadian Society for Surgery of the Hand)
  3. Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy (Canadian Society of Respiratory Therapists)
  4. Current Research: Cardiology (International Academy of Cardiovascular Sciences)
  5. Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada (Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease (AMMI) Canada)
  6. Canadian Journal of Medical of Sonography (Sonography Canada)
  7. Canadian IONM News (Canadian Association of Neurophysiological Monitoring (CANM))
  8. Current Research: Integrative Medicine
  9. Journal of Sexual & Reproductive Medicine
  10. Diabetes Management
  11. Interventional Cardiology
  12. Clinical Practice (Therapy)
  13. Clinical Investigation
  14. International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology
  15. Imaging in Medicine
  16. Pharmaceutical Bioprocessing
  17. Neuropsychiatry
  18. International Journal of Clinical Skills
  19. Canadian Hearing Report

B. List of Open Access Journals journals as of 2016-09-23:

  1. Clinical Investigation
  2. Clinical Practice (Therapy)
  3. Diabetes Management
  4. Imaging in Medicine
  5. International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology
  6. International Journal of Clinical Skills
  7. Interventional Cardiology
  8. Neuropsychiatry
  9. Pharmaceutical Bioprocessing

Everything’s Bogus at The Journal of Nature and Science

$
0
0
Bogus peer review.

Bogus peer review.

If you haven’t already, you may soon receive a spam email from the predatory Journal of Nature and Science (JNSCI) — I just got one myself. The spam email will praise one of your recent articles and ask you to re-work it into a short, new article for the journal. It will be signed by “Dr. Frank, Ph.D., Editor/Reviewer,” a contrived name.

“Dr. Frank” is really Aiguo Wu, a former postdoc and later staff researcher at UCLA. He lives in Monterey Park, California and operates the journal out of his apartment.

Another former researcher turned publisher.

Another former researcher turned publisher.

Wu’s image and profile appear on the lab website of UCLA’s Dr. Fernando Gómez-Pinilla, at his “NeuroLife Laboratory.” However, Wu’s LinkedIn profile indicates he left the lab (and UCLA) in 2013 to dedicate himself to the journal, spamming and cashing in on the easy article acceptance the journal offers.

Manage Your Own Peer Review

Indeed, the Journal of Nature and Science stands out for allowing scholarly authors the option of arranging their own pre-submission peer review and then sending the review reports along with the manuscript to the journal, where it is then rapidly published for a fee.

The details.

The details.

The journal’s “Peer Review Process” page spells it out:

Before Submission: Your manuscript has been reviewed by two or more reviewers and improved based on their comments when you submit it to JNSCI. That means the peer review process is completed by yourself before you submit it to JNSCI.

JNSCI is more than happy to publish your pre-pub peer reviewed article.

Naturally, such a system is subject to abuse, with authors writing peer reviews of their own papers and submitting them as if they were from peers.

JNSCI’s Marketing Strategy

The journal’s niche is that it offers researchers the ability to publish short articles quickly and cheaply — and with the self-done peer review.

Wu charges 99 dollars to publish a research article and 80 dollars to publish a review article. If you got one of the spam emails, you are an “invited author” and have the opportunity to ask for a 50% discount on the fees.

He also offers a free option, but the published papers are not published open-access, and authors must transfer copyright. The papers are then available through a pay-per-view option. He profits from either option.

Analysis

Wu’s shabby journal is an affront to both nature and science. His spam emails are annoying many busy researchers, and they should cease immediately. The journal exists only to enable Wu to make an easy profit from researchers’ need to publish. I wonder if he is reporting all his income to state and federal tax authorities.

Hat tip: Dr. Kathryn H. Jacobsen

Appendix: The spam email I received:

From: Dr.Frank | Editor [mailto:publish@jnsci.org]
Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2016 7:52 AM
To: Beall, Jeffrey <Jeffrey.Beall@ucdenver.edu>
Subject: Dangerous Predatory Publishers Threaten Medical Research.-

Hello, your paper is so interesting to me. May I ask you:

Could you contribute short review based on your published papers OR report your new research findings in JNSCI?

JNSCI (2377-2700) has published more than 100 interesting articles from Editor-invited and/or NIH-funded authors.

You can submit online: www.jnsci.org OR by email: admin@jnsci.org

Your paper may be published rapidly within just one week. Hope you have interest at this time OR in the future.

Thanks for help.

Best wishes,

Dr. Frank, Ph.D., Editor/Reviewer
Journal of Nature and Science (JNSCI)
ISSN 2377-2700 | www.jnsci.org | Los Angeles, CA
—————-
Note. I do not have mailing list, but send you this personally (not automatically) after I saw your interesting paper. Please forgive me if you received similar email.


Four New Sketchy OA Publishers from September, 2016

$
0
0

This blog post describes four new open-access publishers I added to my publisher list in September, 2016. Two of them may be ghost brands from OMICS International, continuing in its strategy to dominate and saturate medical publishing with its low-quality, duplicative, and unneeded open-access journals. The four new publishers profiled here are Aster Publications, Science Research Association, Scientific Literature, and United Scholars Publication.

Wilted flower.

Wilted flower.

1. Aster Publications

I learned about Aster Publications on September 21st when I was forwarded a spam email for Aster’s Journal of Aquaculture and Environmental Impacts, one of seven new journals from this publisher.

The spam email was signed by “Neil Evans,” almost certainly a contrived name. The spam email was an invitation to serve on the editorial board, and if you receive an email from Aster, I recommend you discard it.

Another fake address from a predatory publisher.

Another fake address from a predatory publisher.

Aster Publications is one of the two new imprints I describe here that I suspect may be an OMICS International effort. It claims to be based in Green Bay, Wisconsin, not a town known for its scholarly publishing industry.

The domain name data for the journal is blinded, so there’s no confirmation or information about who is behind this amateurish effort. I suspect it’s OMICS or a copycat scammer.


Completely unneeded.

Completely unneeded.

  1. Science Research Association (SCIREA)

Thanks to open-access publishing, we’ve seen in an explosion in the number of scientific “associations.” Open-access profiteers need a veneer of legitimacy to attract articles, and masquerading as an “association” helps provide this cover. SCIREA, as they call themselves for short, is among the newest entry in this crowded field.

The publisher’s “contact us” page doesn’t give any information about where this publisher is based, but the internet domain data indicates the registrant is Li Yu of Beijing, China.

Fake.

Fake.

SCIREA launched with 39 broad journals, many of them with ridiculously broad scopes, such as SCIREA Journal of Education and SCIREA Journal of Sociology. The titles of its journals are more like the titles of children’s books.

They offer authors a membership option, but it’s unclear whether paying members get fee waivers (the author fee is $100) or just discounts on the fee. The publisher states it this way: “Subscribe for Interminable Submissions,” another demonstration of the limitations of Google Translate. This publisher is just another attempt to exploit researchers for profit. I wish it would just disappear.


Trash literature.

Trash literature.

  1. Scientific Literature

Scientific literature — a presumptuous name for such a malevolent effort — launched with 33 completely duplicative and unneeded medical journals. The publisher claims it’s based in Delaware, the fake home of many predatory publishers.

There’s not much to say about this publisher — its website is spare. The journals don’t even have ISSNs yet, not to mention editorial boards, but they will be happy to accept manuscript submissions.

Medicine is too important to be left to amateur publishers.

Medicine is too important to be left to amateur publishers.

They’ve lifted pictures from across the internet to decorate their journal covers. This publisher may be owned by OMICS, for it matches their modus operandi.

Why does the scholarly publishing industry not regulate itself better? Why are we seeing complex medical journals — such as the Journal Of Clinical Neurology, Neurosurgery And Spine — being launched and operated by greedy amateurs?


United for easy profit.

United for easy profit.

  1. United Scholars Publications

I added United Scholars Publications to my list on September 26th, and on the 28th I got an email from someone named Casey White, their “Editorial Coordinator,” asking me to remove it. I didn’t.

This publisher gives the address of the Anaheim post office (2255 West Ball Road) as its business address. It has one overall editorial board, and the editorial boards for the 14 journals it publishes are drawn from this master list, with the names jumbled for each one.

Among the four publishers, this one seems to be the sneakiest. It may really be based in Northern California and run by someone who works at Sonoma State University.

In several places on its website, this publisher declares “No publication fee,” but on the inside it mentions an $86 dollar fee.

The journals are a strange mix of engineering and humanities titles. I don’t see this publisher as a bona fide effort to enable scholarly communication. I think it’s just a scheme to earn easy profit from researchers, a scheme that is late to the party.

Hat tip: Dr. Kathryn H. Jacobsen, et al.

Appendix:

List of Aster Publications journals as of 2016-10-01:

  1. Aster Family Medicine
  2. Aster Medical Case Reports
  3. Journal of Ageing, Disability and Chronic Disease
  4. Journal of Aquaculture and Environmental Impacts
  5. Journal of Gynecology and Fertility
  6. Journal of HIV/AIDs & Current Research
  7. Journal of Nano Studies and Applications

List of Science Research Association journals as of 2016-10-01:

  1. SCIREA Journal of Agriculture
  2. SCIREA Journal of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine
  3. SCIREA Journal of Astronomy
  4. SCIREA Journal of Aviation & Aerospace
  5. SCIREA Journal of Biology
  6. SCIREA Journal of Chemical Engineering
  7. SCIREA Journal of Chemistry
  8. SCIREA Journal of Civil Engineering and Building Construction
  9. SCIREA Journal of Clinical Medicine
  10. SCIREA Journal of Computer Science and Technology
  11. SCIREA Journal of Dynamic and Electric Engineering
  12. SCIREA Journal of Economics
  13. SCIREA Journal of Education
  14. SCIREA Journal of Electrics, Communication and Automatic Control
  15. SCIREA Journal of Environmental Science and Technology
  16. SCIREA Journal of Fisheries
  17. SCIREA Journal of Food Science and Technology
  18. SCIREA Journal of Forestry
  19. SCIREA Journal of Geosciences
  20. SCIREA Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
  21. SCIREA Journal of Information Science and Systems Science
  22. SCIREA Journal of Management Science
  23. SCIREA Journal of Materials Science
  24. SCIREA Journal of Mathematics
  25. SCIREA Journal of Mechanical Engineering
  26. SCIREA Journal of Mechanics
  27. SCIREA Journal of Metallurgical Engineering
  28. SCIREA Journal of Mine Engineering Technology
  29. SCIREA Journal of Pharmacology
  30. SCIREA Journal of Philosophy
  31. SCIREA Journal of Physics
  32. SCIREA Journal of Preclinical Medicine
  33. SCIREA Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene
  34. SCIREA Journal of Safety Science and Technology
  35. SCIREA Journal of Science and Technology of Energy Sources
  36. SCIREA Journal of Sociology
  37. SCIREA Journal of Survey & Drawing Science and Technology
  38. SCIREA Journal of Textile Science and Technology
  39. SCIREA Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering

List of Scientific Literature journals as of 2016-10-01:

  1. Annals of Diabetes, Metabolic Disorders & Control
  2. Annals of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation
  3. Anxiety and Depression Journal
  4. Biometrics and Biostatistics Journal
  5. Cancer Prevention: Current Research Journal
  6. Chromatography and Separation Techniques Journal
  7. Clinical Dermatology: Research and Therapy
  8. Gerontology and Geriatric Research
  9. Immunology Research and Therapy Journal
  10. Journal of Case Reports: Clinical & Medical
  11. Journal of Clinical Neurology, Neurosurgery and Spine
  12. Journal of Nephrology & Kidney Diseases
  13. Journal of Otolaryngology: Research
  14. Lung, Pulmonary & Respiratory Research Journal
  15. Nanomedicine and Nanotechnology Journal
  16. Neurological Disorders & Epilepsy Journal
  17. Nutrition and Food Science Journal
  18. Ophthalmology and Ophthalmic Surgery
  19. Pharmaceutical Sciences and Biomedical Analysis Journal
  20. Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Journal
  21. SL Cell Science & Report
  22. SL Clinical and Experimental Cardiology
  23. SL Clinical and Medical Oncology
  24. SL Clinical Medicine: Research
  25. SL Dentistry, Oral Disorders and Therapy
  26. SL Gastroenterology
  27. SL Journal of Anesthesia & Critical Care
  28. SL Nutrition and Metabolism
  29. SL Pediatrics & Therapeutics
  30. SL Pharmacology and Toxicology
  31. SL Vaccines and Vaccination Journal
  32. Urology: Research and Therapeutics Journal
  33. Virology & Retrovirology Journal

List of United Scholars Publications journals as of 2016-10-01:

  1. Journal of Advances in Electronics and Power Systems
  2. Journal of Advances in Life and Natural Sciences
  3. Journal of Control, Robotics, and Mechatronic Systems
  4. Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Studies
  5. Journal of Humanities and Social Studies
  6. Journal of Informatics and Computing Technology
  7. Journal of Language and Literature Research
  8. Journal of Marketing and Business Studies
  9. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics
  10. Journal of Modeling and Simulation of Antennas and Propagation
  11. Journal of Networks and Telecommunication Systems
  12. Journal of Wearable and Flexible Electronics
  13. Progress in Biomedical Engineering Research
  14. Progress in Telemedicine and E-Health

 


Allied Academies: Bad Business Decisions, Misdirected Blame, and a New Name

$
0
0
allied-business-academies

New name, same old poor management.

The owners of Allied Academies have made some truly incompetent business decisions, including associating with the notorious Indian publisher OMICS International — which is freely using Allied Academies’ name in its business dealings. You may have heard that OMICS is currently under investigation by the Federal Trade Commission.

The owner of Allied Academies refuses to take responsibility for the mismanagement and is distributing an “open letter” that basically denies responsibility for the sorry state the publisher is in and blames me for damaging its reputation. This accusation is unprofessional and false.

The letter says,

As you may have heard, Allied Academies was added to Beall’s list of possible predatory publishers earlier this year. Without going into too many details, Jim Carland, [sic] signed a contract with a publishing company last year that was offering to give us website and copyediting support. That contract enabled them to post other journals to the Allied website, which we did not think would be an issue. Most of the newly added journals are in the field of science, which we thought would give Allied Academies a broader appeal. However, most of these newly added journals are open access, and Beall’s list consists of open access journals that employ a specific type of publication process that he deems to be unethical.

Here the publisher is being non-transparent and only telling half the story. Allied Academies stupidly signed a contract with OMICS International, a known predatory publisher. Why did they sign a contract with OMICS? Because it benefitted them financially. What respectable publisher would knowingly agree to let a predator add journals to its website?

The letter continues:

In the meantime, Beall’s list has created some permanent damage to the name Allied Academies, and we are contractually obligated to keep the open access journals on that site. Therefore, we have created a new site to move the business journals to: Allied Business Academies.

They blame me for the incompetent business decisions. If any publisher should be able to make competent business decisions, it is a publisher of scholarly business journals.

So Allied Academies’ “solution” is to create a new branding (Allied Business Academies) and a new website for its original journals. The publisher now has two websites:

Allied Academies was never a top-tier publisher. In fact, over the years, I have regularly received emails asking me why it wasn’t on my list and suggesting that I add it. However, its journals weren’t open-access, so I resisted (the OMICS journals on the site are OA, and after they appeared there I added Allied Academies to my list. This was in December, 2015).

Here are some of Allied Academies long-term weaknesses (before their affiliation with OMICS):

  1. Coercive membership: According to their website, “All authors of manuscripts which are accepted for publication must become members of the appropriate Academy prior to publication of the manuscript. Membership fees are currently $75 per year, payable online at the Join an Academy page.”
  2. The publisher offers a fast-track peer review option:

To be eligible for Accelerated Journal Review (AJR), at least one author must have registered for physical or Internet participation in one of our four regularly scheduled Conferences each year. Instructions for Accelerated Journal Review submission are emailed to Conference registrants when the registration fee is paid.

  1. Like the Clute Institute, Allied Academies holds its “conferences” in popular tourist spots. In fact, its next three scheduled conferences will be in these places:

Las Vegas
Jamaica
New Orleans


candler-north-carolina

Candler, North Carolina, home of Allied Academies (Courtesy Google Maps)

OMICS’ Use of Allied Academies’ Name to Offer to Buy Other Publishers and Journals

OMICS is using the Allied Academies name to make offers to buy other journals. Here is an email following up on one such offer, with the victim journal’s identifying information redacted:

——– Forwarded message ——–

RE: Proposal for “[Redacted]”
Date: 2016-09-26 [Time redacted]
From: Kevin Jace <kevin@alliedacademies.org>
To: [Redacted]
Dear [Redacted],

Greetings!

Thanks for getting in touch with Allied Academies!

I am Kevin Jace writing to you on behalf of Allied Academies. Our executive Mr. Peter, with whom you are in communication earlier has left the organization and had passed on all the responsibilities to me which he used to take care. So, from now on I will be the authorized person to take this conversation further.

We are happy to see you get interest inclined towards this collaboration. I am now elaborating the brief proposal with which ALLIED ACADEMIES appeared along with the benefits that it carries. Kindly go through its content below:

Complete Acquisition:

On opting this:  The entire ownership of the journal will be transferred to Allied Academies after which the entire responsibilities of the journal will be taken care by Allied Academies.

To gain entire ownership on the journal, our evaluators will look after few key parameters.

Key parameters:

  • Indexing of the journal
  • No. of volumes
  • Publication start year
  • Scope of the journal
  • Total no. of articles published.

After evaluation, Allied Academies would pay a fixed royalty amount as a onetime payment for its complete acquisition (including the website in which the journal is being hosted).

Benefits after post acquisition:

  • [Redacted] will gain support of extensive network of readers/authors that cling to Allied Academies.
  • Definite increase in quality work as Allied Academies follows a stringent peer-review process giving the quality its first priority.
  • Huge and strong marketing network of Allied Academies will help in enhancing the visibility of the journal globally.
  • Promotion of the journal through Allied Academies’ marketing activities.
  • Promotional activities through conference partners.
  • Use of Editorial Manager tracking system for smooth running of the journal.
  • Protection of the journal from plagiarized manuscripts
  • Support and encouragement of millions of readers around the globe.
  • Quality oriented team work and better visibility of the journal.
  • Allied Academies would strive for better indexing of journal along with its maintenance and it’s up gradation.

Additional benefits:

  • We will conduct editorial board meetings; special discounts to staff and editorial board members of the journal to attend the conferences.
  • Conferences organized on the specific journal topic.
  • Special issues released periodically.

In addition to this we will promote your website on the journal homepage.

Editorial board details:

The editorial board remains the same.  For the betterment and global expansion of the journal we may add few more editors to the editorial board. It is to the discretion of the existing board members to remain with the board or not.

We coin some special issues for the journals and Editors have a benefit to earn about 25% of the revenue generated on the special issues for those articles which are contributed by the editors i.e., based on their contributions we pay them 25% share from the amount generated.

If you are interested in selling the journal to us, I shall soon come up with the price for complete takeover along with the website on which the journal is being hosted. On mutual terms agreed by both the parties, we shall draft and send the agreement to you. The agreement which is send to you should be duly signed by the owner of the journal. Once the agreement is signed, we will be paying you 20%-30% of the amount as a part of first tranche and remaining should be paid once we receive all the archives, Website credentials etc. as a part of second tranche. It solely depends on how fast you will send the files to go for remaining payment.

Please feel free to write to me if you have any further queries.

I will be glad to receive a positive response from you.

Thanks & Regards,

Kevin

This is the same strategy OMICS International used in Canada this year. It bought a publisher and then made subsequent offers to buy journals using the publisher’s name. The reputation of OMICS is so bad that it has to hide itself to do business with other publishers.

Conclusion

Referring to the Allied Academies’ journals, the open letter states:

They continue to be double-blind, peer reviewed and now have an acceptance rate of 15%. The journals have actually had a 15% acceptance rate on average for the last few years and we neglected to update it until now.

For years, Allied bragged that its journals had the same acceptance rate for all its journals: 25%. Now,  they are claiming that the acceptance rate for all journals has magically dropped to 15%.

This is pure bunk. It is statistically impossible for an entire suite of journals to have the exact same acceptance rate and for that rate to drop to 15% simultaneously for all journals.

Who do they think they are fooling?



Bogus British Company “Accredits” OMICS Conferences

$
0
0

 

Accreditation for sale.

Accreditation for sale.

Notorious open-access publisher OMICS International operates a scholarly conference division called Conference Series LLC. I learned recently that a London-based corporation called The CPD Standards Office has “accredited” all of OMICS International’s exploitative conferences.

Euro-trash.

Euro-trash.

A linked logo now appears on all of OMICS’ conferences. The logo reads “Accredited CPD.” Clicking on the logo brings one to a page like this one [PDF] called the “CPD Standards Factsheet.”

In actuality, the facts are that OMICS has paid this firm to accredit its bogus conferences. Any accreditation agency that grants accreditation to OMICS International or its divisions has no value as an accreditor.

This is confirmed by the CPD’s website which says,

The CPDSO accreditation services do not have a pass / fail philosophy, our friendly assessment team will work with you to achieve CPDSO accreditation successfully.

Indeed, all a firm has to do is pay, and the accreditation is granted. If this agency accredits OMICS and its conferenceseries.com brand, then surely it will accredit anything.

Now we get it.

Now we get it.

It is clear why OMICS International / Conferenceseries.com wants to emblazon its conference websites with the bogus CPD logo. It tricks people and universities into thinking the conferences are authentic, when they are really just a predatory means of exploiting university travel funds.

In fact, this is how CPD markets its automatic accreditation services to conference organizers such as OMICS.

I recommend that researchers avoid all journals published under the OMICS International umbrella and avoid all conferences organized by conferenceseries.com.

Moreover, I recommend strong skepticism towards anything “accredited” by the CPD Standards Office.


--- Article Removed ---

$
0
0
***
***
*** RSSing Note: Article removed by member request. ***
***

Don’t Use PubMed as a Journal Whitelist

$
0
0
pubmed

Proceed with caution.

PubMed is not MEDLINE. I recommend against using PubMed as a list of quality journals for the purposes of finding a journal to publish in, evaluating academic performance, awarding grants and degrees, and assessing job candidates. In addition, I recommend against relying on PubMed for literature reviews, unless the search results are restricted to MEDLINE journals only.

MEDLINE continues to have relatively strict inclusion criteria. But PubMed is not the same entity as MEDLINE.  PubMed is MEDLINE plus thousands of other journals, including many low-quality and predatory journals. The criteria for inclusion in PubMed (or PubMed Central, the full-text repository associated with PubMed) are minimal compared to the MEDLINE standards.

A journal’s inclusion in PubMed does not mean the journal has a stamp of approval from NIH. There is such a low barrier to inclusion that researchers are advised to be suspicious of any journal that boasts about its inclusion in PubMed, especially if the boasting is prominently displayed on the journal’s main web page. PubMed inclusion is not an achievement that merits boasts.

It is misleading that these potentially low-quality articles, many of which have not undergone rigorous peer review, are featured prominently in PubMed searches. The default search bar (at the left side of the screen after a PubMed search is conducted) features a filter for “Free full text”. Predatory journals that upload articles get highlighted in this way, while it is relatively difficult to find the filter for limiting searches to journals included in MEDLINE.

MEDLINE

If you seek a whitelist of scholarly journals in the biomedical sciences, use MEDLINE. MEDLINE is a curated, vetted list of about 5,600 journals that have been reviewed and approved by the National Library of Medicine. These journals are just a small fraction of the nearly 26,000 journals indexed in PubMed.

There are two relatively easy ways to confirm that an item indexed in PubMed was published in a MEDLINE-indexed journal.

One is to search the NLM Catalog for the journal and to check the line for “current Indexing Status” to see whether the journal is listed as “Currently indexed for MEDLINE” (or as “Not currently indexed for MEDLINE”).

The other is to search PubMed for abstracts and to limit the results to items published in MEDLINE journals.

Limit your search.

Limit your search.

To do this:

  1. Enter your search terms into the PubMed search box shown above.
  2. On the search results page, click on “Show additional filters” on the lower left.
  3. Select “Journal categories” in the pop-up box that appears.
  4. When the revised menu is presented on the left of the search screen, look for the MEDLINE option under the journal options header. Click on MEDLINE to limit your search results to MEDLINE-indexed journals.

Be aware that this limiter option may exclude some entries for MEDLINE articles. For example, in-process and “ahead of print” citations may be marked as not being included in MEDLINE even if they are preprints in MEDLINE journals. However, this option will help searchers avoid clogging their searches with articles from predatory journals.

Conclusion

PubMed is a database that indexes articles from many thousands of journals, including predatory journals. As the proportion of articles from predatory and other low-quality journals increases in PubMed, the database’s value decreases. However, researchers in the biomedical sciences can use MEDLINE as a whitelist and can use PubMed to access MEDLINE if they use the appropriate search limiters.

Hat tip: Dr. Kathryn H. Jacobsen


Journal Offers Authors “Research Paper Royalty Scheme” for Getting Citations

$
0
0
international-journal-of-emerging-technology-and-advanced-engineering

Fake.

A completely bogus, India-based, open-access journal is offering authors money if their papers published in the journal get cited a certain number of times in a fixed period.

The journal is the International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering. The offer is being made through a spam email being distributed by the journal. It says,

All published articles from  September 2016 onwards will be applicable for “Research Paper Royalty Scheme” in which  corresponding author will get a reimbursement of 100 USD/6000 INR if his/her paper is cited by any 20 researchers in any reputed International Journal/Conferences in a year. If you are confident about your Research work then IJETAE will be honoured to appreciate it. Author can also keep track on Citation Count using Google Scholar.

The International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering is deceptive in many ways. It claims to be “An ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal (can’t be true).” It claims to have an impact factor of 2.324 (it’s a lie), and it claims to have a 10% acceptance rate (another lie).

The journal requires copyright transfer and charges USD $170 to publish. It doesn’t give any headquarters location, but it’s clear it’s from India. The journal’s main email address is a Gmail account: ijetae@gmail.com.

The citation scheme will incentivize citation cartels — authors gratuitously agreeing to cite each other only for the purpose of increasing the number of citations.

It’s unclear why they journal wants to increase its number of citations, for it already displays the fake impact factor.

Fake impact factor.

Fake impact factor.

This journal is not about “emerging technology” or “advanced engineering.” It’s about cheating and easy profits. I encourage all Indian accreditation agencies to remove this journal from all approved journal lists. It is complete rubbish.

Hat tip: Dr. Fernando J. Rodríguez Macías

Appendix: The spam email:

 

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Editorial Desk <editor@ijetae.com>
Date: Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 11:54 PM
Subject: IJETAE CFP Oct 2016: Earn Royalty of Your Published Paper
To: Researcher [Redacted]

Dear Researcher

Best Wishes For Your Good Health and Happiness

After publishing 57 Regular Issues and 22 Conferences , International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering (An ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal, ISSN 2250–2459(Online)),  invites you to submit research paper for publishing in Volume 6, Issue 10, Oct 2016. 

 Research Paper Submission for Volume 6, Issue 10, Oct 2016

Subject Domain: Engineering, Technology and Science

  Paper Submission Email IDs:  ijetae@gmail.comsubmit_ijetae@yahoo.com

Deadline for Submitting Manuscript: Oct 15, 2016

Please visit the below link for IJETAE Editorial Team (More than 300 Academicians from all parts of Globe):
http://ijetae.com/editorial_board.html

Please visit the below link for IJETAE Published Conferences (22 Conferences Published)

http://www.ijetae.com/conferencepublication.html

Please visit the below link for IJETAE Published Issues (57 Issues Published)

http://ijetae.com/contents.html

Researchers/ Scholars are invited to submit original papers in IJETAE Paper Template Format. Download 

Queries are welcomed at  ijetae@gmail.com .Please mention your contact number while submitting manuscript.

All published articles from  September 2016 onwards will be applicable for “Research Paper Royalty Scheme” in which  corresponding author will get a reimbursement of 100 USD/6000 INR if his/her paper is cited by any 20 researchers in any reputed International Journal/Conferences in a year. If you are confident about your Research work then IJETAE will be honoured to appreciate it. Author can also keep track on Citation Count using Google Scholar.

Regards

IJETAE Team
ISSN 2250–2459 (Online) ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal
Web site: www.ijetae.com
Disclaimer: This email is sent to you in belief that you are affiliated with Academic/Research at best of our knowledge and IJETAE will be honored to publish manuscript prepared by such researchers like you. If you like  to stop receiving alert mails from us then please use this link http://www.ijetae.com/unsub.php  Unsubscribe here


Reviewer to Frontiers: Your Review Process is Merely for Show — I quit

$
0
0
Frontiers

Equal opportunity for junk science.

A senior researcher recently forwarded me a copy of an email he sent to the controversial Switzerland-based open-access publisher Frontiers. In the email, the researcher resigns as a Frontiers reviewer, citing fatal flaws in the publisher’s peer review process.

Here’s the email, anonymized at the sender’s request:

From: [Redacted]
Sent: [Redacted] 2016 [redacted]
To: ‘Frontiers in Psychology’ <psychology@frontiersin.org>
Subject: RE: Frontiers in Psychology

Hi Dr. Ashikali,

I have finished my final review for Frontiers. Please remove me from the so-called “Review” Board.

As someone who reviews for over 40 scientific journals, I would like to note that I have continued concerns about Frontiers’ status as a predatory journal / publication mill. For the final resubmission I was waiting to review, the authors resubmitted without addressing any of the major concerns (basically saying see certain lines of text, which were actually word-for-word unchanged). The “review” process simply leads to low-quality work. Reviewers are bombarded with dozens of irrelevant review requests. In the event they agree to review, resubmissions commonly include letters that point to passages of text that have supposedly been “updated” but have not in actuality. Since reviewers are so overburdened with low-quality and irrelevant work from this journal, and because the rejection process is needlessly intricate (with numerous “are you sure” warnings), I suspect many non-updated or non-responsive resubmissions make it to publication. Essentially, this makes the “review” process merely for show. The incentive process supports low-quality reviews from reviewers, authors getting published, and Frontiers getting paid.

I will be forwarding a redacted version of this correspondence to Beall’s list. Please remove my name from your web site.

[Redacted]

Frontiers is on my list, and I recommend against submitting papers to its many journals.

Frontiers has been on the attack against me for months, as documented in Leonid’s Schneider’s blog For Better Science.

The publisher has sent numerous emails to the President of the University of Colorado and other university officials demanding that they silence me. They’ve recruited some of their editors to send long, smarmy messages praising the “beauty” of Frontiers to university officials.

One of the commenters on Schneider’s blog post noted that COPE guidelines advise publishers to be polite and avoid being drawn into personal exchanges. Frontiers has attacked both me and Schneider in long exchanges, in apparent violation of the COPE guidelines.

However, Frontiers used its wealth to recruit and hire a COPE board member from another publisher, so the likelihood of any corrective action from COPE is remote.

If there were a listing of arrogant predatory open-access publishers, I think Frontiers would lead the list.


Viewing all 421 articles
Browse latest View live